Talk:яйца

Did we agree to keep a simpler form of the headword for inflected forms - no gender, number and animacy? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No, I don't think so. My bot adds gender/animacy to the headword for inflected forms, and also number for plurale tantum nouns when it doesn't cause a clash. The logic here is that this info isn't available in the definition line. I think it's important to keep this info in the headword. Benwing2 (talk) 11:53, 23 January 2016 (UTC)