Talk:תביעה משפטית

RFD discussion: July–November 2020
Probably a bad Tbot entry. --Dada por viva (talk) 01:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP: is sufficient, the adjective mishpatit ("legal") is implied in the noun tvi'a already. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 11:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Could you please create those entries? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Those arguments seem a bit contradictory to me; if every תביעה is implicitly משפטית, yet people say "תביעה משפטית" anyway (which they do: Google finds plenty of hits on each of ynet.co.il, haaretz.co.il, and maariv.co.il), then that's not exactly SOP. I'm not sure why people say it, though; my first thought was to avoid confusion with its homophone, but it's pretty rare that this would actually be confusing in context. And we even find "תביעה משפטית" in headlines, where I wouldn't expect journalists to waste space on a word that serves no purpose in writing. That said, a usage note at [[תביעה]] might be more helpful than a separate entry at [[תביעה משפטית]]. —Ruakh TALK 02:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I added tvi'a mishpatit as a usage note at תביעה, which I created. (There is already an entry for משפטי). So I think that should address those concerns. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 19:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * RFD deleted. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 13:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)