Talk:دعش

RFV discussion: March 2020–November 2022
Arabic. —213.166.157.228 16:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * @Fay Freak: There are quotes in the entry, but the whole thing is a bit of a mess. Could you sort this one out? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * @Metaknowledge Fixed. The quotes provided did not have it reflexive as labelled, and such usage is not expected of . The Saudi IP was of course affronted by the example: as it does not work this way, it would mean “Why do Saudi make [missing object] Dāʿiš”. Fay Freak (talk) 18:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * @Fay Freak: Thank you, although these don't seem to be durably archived, unless I'm mistaken. Can you assess this and rustle up cites sufficient to pass CFI? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:54, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * No. Libraries are closed. Not that I would have one in my vicinity anyway, or would go to one if there were one. Or know a considerable searchable corpus or archive of Arabic content produced since the prominence of Dāʿiš. Maybe Wiktionary should stop balling with formal requirements that nobody can fulfil to turn a blind eye on material reasons of inclusion. Fay Freak (talk) 20:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * RFV-passed. Nobody is gonna seek out anything other than the newsquotes we have translated. Fay Freak (talk) 11:11, 3 November 2022 (UTC)