Talk:عَان

Why?
Those entries have been languishing in rfv/rfd hell for four months now. They are fake terms made up by the user Romandalusi (who added several hundred more in various Latin descendants sections). These issues were brought up as early as September 2021. @Fenakhay Nicodene (talk) 05:37, 8 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirecting them isn't the right way... If they failed rfd/rfv, you should tag them with 1. — Fenakhay ( حيطي · مساهماتي ) 05:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @Fenakhay They all failed verification. I scoured the Mozarabic corpus (which isn't much) months ago, as did Santi2222 in early May. Please, just delete them. Nicodene (talk) 05:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * It is still not how you deal with failed rfv. Next time, you tag with 1 to be speedied then you archive the rfv discussion in the language category (as it affects many entries) with redirects in every failed rfv talk page. — Fenakhay ( حيطي · مساهماتي ) 05:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I see. Thank you for explaining the procedure (and dealing with the entries). Nicodene (talk) 06:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

RFV discussion: May 2022

 * See Category talk:Mozarabic language.