Talk:هزینه

Etymology
Is this etymology correct? I doubt it... — Fenakhay ( حيطي · مساهماتي ) 13:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No, the spelling is too dubious, it should be Book Pahlavi ʾwcynk' as in and you find it in some transcribed documents with the string   on Google Books. What happened to Pahlavica, ? Were the Russians behind it? I liked to check Middle Persian attested forms from it. Fay Freak (talk) 13:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * How would I know about Pahlavica? :) The etymology given here is the standard one accepted in the literature. The problem of h- is described in Hassandoust, but I don't know Persian. The family of 🇨🇬 may also belong here. Vahag (talk) 14:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, maybe there was a site move without redirects that passed by me, or some Iranists told you, though we are frequently missing them.  has a normal Arabic pattern and there are other words in the root formula خ ز ن from which it may have been derived, ultimately the well-known word as behind – seems more likely to me at least, the semantics are as expected there, while there are some problems with “cost” → ”treasury” (thought it be a place from which one covers costs) and ∅ or /h/ →, although it would be otherwise if  was an artificial word created by creative administration from both strains of word material. Fay Freak (talk) 15:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)