Talk:وجنة

Let's figure it out
This is exactly your métier. IP didn’t like the definition as cheek, and is probably right. and  don’t mean the same thing and  has yet another usage. The antagonists  and  again deviate from English concepts, for comparison and entropy.

Privy to the general conceptualization, we will be able explain through which semantic ideas and perchance derivatives this comes from. of course says it is from the dual of but I am afraid the intermediate step for this development is not quite thinkable. I rather suspect it has to do something with some, and in various technical applications cheeks transmit the force of a thing being beaten up and down so reversely here the name of the body part is transferred from (a piece of primitive) technology. Fay Freak (talk) 06:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Ibn Manzur's own definition, together with others that he quotes, approximates matches that of.


 * The IP's objection is not wrong, but since the entry is not that expanded or detailed, it seems to me like "nitpicking". Roger.M.Williams (talk) 11:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)