Talk:अनुनासिक

The Sanskrit etymology is a bit lacking; I can't figure out what has to do with this. --Barytonesis (talk) 12:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * lol, it's, the prefix. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 12:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * that explains it :p
 * Re : I'm completely out of my depth here, but don't you think it's useful to have a synchronic explanation of the word, and to have it categorised in CAT:Hindi words suffixed with -इक? I'm always doing it for French words when they're transparent, and when it really looks like the derivation happens in French. An example (other people prefer "surface analysis: xxx + xxx"). --Barytonesis (talk) 15:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, Hindi does not retain Sanskrit's ablaut system (that's why the a of is lengthened in ). Modern Hindi coinages using  don't do that. I usually try to say "surface analysis" when I can. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 16:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)