Talk:अशैक्षमार्ग

RFV discussion: September 2021–January 2022
Svārtava2 • 16:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree. This entry shouldn't exist just because the Tocharian loan exists. No results on the Digital Corpus of Sanskrit.
 * This term is attested. --Frigoris (talk) 19:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Frigoris (talk) 07:20, 17 September 2021 (UTC)


 * RFV-passed —Svārtava [t•c•u•r] 16:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

आनपानस्मृति
I think there are a whole host of Sanskrit entries that seem to exist only to anchor a Tocharian B term. Digital Corpus of Sanskrit.
 * If it's not attested as Sanskrit but has been inferred from a Tocharian B borrowing by someone who knows what they're doing, it should be moved to the Reconstruction namespace as Reconstruction/Sanskrit/आनपानस्मृति. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * This word is attested, but the lemma is misspelt. The correct lemma should be, notice the three long ā's. For attestation, see link to Univ. Oslo Buddhist library (The Udānavarga). The term is in Edgerton's dictionary (last headword in column 1). --Frigoris (talk) 19:11, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Given that the Tocharian B entry is at with long vowels in the expected places, and  admits to not knowing much Sanskrit beyond what's in the Tocharian B dictionary, the probability of a misreading or a typo is quite high. Does anyone have access to that dictionary? I'm curious whether it uses Devanagari or transliteration, and whether it really has this spelling. If it has transliterations, the use of different diacritics on the same letters to indicate completely different Devanagari letters makes it very dangerous to do what I call "backliteration". If it's a simple error in copying from the source, the best solution might be to move it to the correct spelling and to create a new alternative form entry at this spelling in the unlikely event that someone finds evidence for it. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The Tocharian B dictionary has TB., derived from Sa. . —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The Adams dictionary uses the ISO-style r̥ for vocalic R (IAST ṛ). Many of the Sanskrit loanwords in Tocharian B (mostly Buddhist terms) were simply taken "as written", even though (if I remember correctly) Tocharian B doesn't have the vocalic R natively. Tocharian B was written in a Brahmic script evidently descending from old Indic scripts, so this kind of "orthographic loan" is possible. --Frigoris (talk) 07:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)


 * to the correct spelling. —Svārtava [t•c•u•r] 16:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)