Talk:पूर्णमास्

pūrṇamāḥ ~ pūrṇimā
Are the forms found with an -i- (e.g. पुनिव) from pūrṇimā? Anyway, pūrṇimā is also ultimately derived from this noun itself. -- 𝘗𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘺𝘪(𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬) 10:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would be better to move the forms with -i- to पूर्णिमा. However, the descendants section on that entry, which were mostly added by in, may need to improved. Gujarati પૂનમ could be moved to पूर्णमास् similar to Hindi पूनम.  has both -r- and word-final -i similar to  and  making it look like a hypercorrected borrowing from Prakrit. It seems that MOD:hi-noun is not designed to show the declension for पूनौं since the plural forms are shown as nominative , oblique  and vocative . Kutchkutch (talk) 23:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing out the error. I did not notice it (I did notice it at as there was a module error. I will remove it now. I agree that descendants at पूर्णिमा need go be cleaned up. I'll do it. -- 𝘗𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘺𝘪(𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬)  01:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)