Talk:मांसं

RFV discussion: September 2014
This IP has been adding entries in a wide variety of unrelated languages, which always makes me nervous. In this case, though, it was the lack of this spelling in the fairly comprehensive Monier-Williams dictionary that led me to be concerned. I don't know Sanskrit well enough to check thoroughly, so I'm bringing it here. I believe this is a less-documented language, so one mention in a durably-archived source should suffice. Chuck Entz (talk) 07:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * It's an alternative spelling (specifically, a sandhi variant) of, which is the nominative and accusative singular of . It shouldn't be listed as a lemma form. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 08:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)