Talk:मूल्य

RFC discussion: April 2016–February 2021
I think the words ‘capital’ and ‘principal’ are too ambiguous to be used as definitions by themselves. Somebody fluent in Sanskrit should verify what exactly is meant.


 * These are definitions given for, as listed at the online Sanskrit Dictionary.
 * The definitions for at the Sanskrit Dictionary suggests that the  sense is more specifically  in the form of  purchased, rather than  in the form of the monetary amount initially invested: the  as opposed to the .  The latter sense is what is given for  instead.
 * That said, I'm happy to be proven wrong: I am very much in my infancy when it comes to Sanskrit studies. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 18:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Is anyone really fluent in Sanskrit anymore? Renard Migrant (talk) 16:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Apparently there are plenty of Indian Sanskritists who converse to one another in fluent Sanskrit - but I suspect that perhaps none of them are Wiktionarians. - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 23:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

I notice a discrepancy between our definitions for and  and those of SanskritDictionary.com. If the latter are more reliable, then maybe some knowledgeable person could work on this.
 * —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 14:19, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Resolved, RFC template no longer present (and the meanings now seem to have more context). &mdash; surjection &lang;??&rang; 21:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)