Talk:প্রেমিক

Sanskritic "compound"
, how is it a compound when one of the components is a suffix? Note that com also doesn't add suf(/pre)fix cats. Svārtava2 • 15:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I think ’twould be better if sa-com accommodates affixes as well. In Sanskritic formations in contemporary NIA languages, prefixes and suffixes are very productive elements: for instance, Bengali uses the affixes, , , , , , etc. to form Sanskritic compounds. Therefore, it would make more sense if the usage of a hyphen with a word in the templet generates a category for Sanskritic compound as well as the specific prefix or suffix. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  13:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. Yes I guess I would like that for words like . However, compound isn't the best possible term to be used here: note that, which can be used for categorisation by compound, doesn't categorise if there are dashes in any. Eg = CAT:Hindi words prefixed with प्र-, not CAT:Hindi compound words. Svārtava2 • 14:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * When I had proposed the creation of sa-com, what I had in mind was formation from tatsama elements, words, affixes, or whatever. So, to accommodate affixes, I guess the templet should be renamed to sa-af; the text generation could be: ‘Sanskritic formation from X + Y’, where X, Y are tatsama words or affixes. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  14:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Nice!! Thanks. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  14:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @Inqilābī I added the word coined to emphasise that these are certainly not borrowings from Sanskrit. Svārtava2 • 15:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree with that change; but no need to bold the word… ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  15:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

yea ok. Fixed. —Svārtava2 • 03:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)