Talk:ทรงพระกรุณาโปรดเกล้าโปรดกระหม่อม

RFD discussion: December 2016–September 2017
The entry's author tagged this for speedy deletion, but should it be kept? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 19:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I created the entry and I became uncertain if it's a lemma or SOP, as it can be treated as a mere combination of two phrases ( + ) or as a single, valid phrase (because it seems like the two phrases are always together). Anyway, since the meanings of the two phrases do not change when they are put together, I then requested deletion of this entry. --หมวดซาโต้ (talk) 19:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I know next to nothing about Thai, but from how you describe it, certainly looks like an unidiomatic sum of  +, even if it is a common collocation. Would you be able to add a  to both  and  that uses , please? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 18:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Just added some citations to, in which and  (shortening of ) appear together. --หมวดซาโต้ (talk) 02:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Great, thanks. I've copied those citations, mutatis mutandis, to and . Could you also add to  citations that use  unabbreviated, please? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 21:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Deleted, as requested by the creator. Wyang (talk) 22:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)