Talk:นักการพนัน

RFV discussion: June 2016–July 2017
The correct term is นักพนัน. --YURi (talk) 06:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @YURi: Thai entered to mean gambler. Entered by User:Alifshinobi, who declares himself to be th-3. นักการพนัน found by Google translate. Apparently found at in space-free blocks of text. Are you sure the term does not meet WT:ATTEST? We are not here concerned with "correctness", merely with attestation in actual use.--Dan Polansky (talk) 07:02, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Put differently, how do you explain all those hits at ? --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Here's one example from Google books I was sort of comfortable with (can't guarantee a good translation):
 * source--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * source--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)


 * นักการพนัน is used among Thai-speaking people. นักพนัน and นักการพนัน are both "correct", although the former is used more often than the latter. Just because one form is used more often than other forms, doesn't mean that the other ones are not used at all and therefore are "incorrect". --A.S. (talk) 16:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you can find citations satisfying WT:CFI, please add them to the page. Otherwise, it is liable to deletion. I also deleted the word above; but again, if you can find cites, do feel free to readd it. If you are unsure what constitutes sufficient attestation, there are many whom you can ask.__Gamren (talk) 11:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh well. Down the drain it goes. RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)