Talk:ปีมะเมีย


 * I'm not really sure this is appropriate for an entry, for the same reason we don't have Year of the Horse in English. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)


 * But it's Thai, not English. It's indeed a term in use.
 * Then if the entry Year of the Horse is created, the present entry can exist, right?
 * There can be a translingual entry, 午, having the same meaning. Why can't there be this entry?
 * --iudexvivorum (talk) 04:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * --iudexvivorum (talk) 04:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)


 * It's not about use, but instead about whether it is a lexical item, or something not appropriate for a dictionary to cover, like a sum of parts.
 * No, it's not dependent on English.
 * That is just one word, whereas this appears to be two words.
 * For more on how we determine whether terms belong in the dictionary or not, please see WT:CFI. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * For more on how we determine whether terms belong in the dictionary or not, please see WT:CFI. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)


 * It's a compound word, rather than two separate words. There are a large number of similar entries, such as ประเทศอังกฤษ, ประเทศกัมพูชา, ประเทศอาเซอร์ไบจาน, ประเทศฟินแลนด์, ประเทศเกาหลีใต้, แม่น้ำโขง, แม่น้ำดานูบ, แมวป่าลิงซ์, แมวศุภลักษณ์, etc. --iudexvivorum (talk) 04:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I still don't know enough Thai to make a good judgement, so I will defer to you. Thanks. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)