Talk:ကတ္တူရဳကာ

RFV discussion: September–November 2021
The form looks to me like a misspelling of. The only 'attestation' I have is its entry as a translation of 'musk' entered by, 'Dr Intobesa'. (The original entry was labelled as being for 'Mon Pali'; it is now presented as being the form in the Mon variant of Pali.) --RichardW57 (talk) 07:08, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. Although,, it seems strange to me that you created the page with on it. If you're unsure of a word's existence, and don't have the required citations for it, then you shouldn't have created it in the first place- you could just remove the translation as "unattested" that doesn't require RFV. Svartava2 (talk) 10:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I was giving the author, who I thought claimed to be a Pali speaker, the opportunity to provide supporting evidence. If the word were in use, it would be a shame to delete it.  Editor to editor enquiries just get the the arrogant reply that he is right. --RichardW57 (talk) 19:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @RichardW57 for now it's fine since the entry is deleted, but from next time don't create entries you don't have attestation for and of which you're unsure. You could've asked that editor on their talk page and any kind of uncivil reply can be reported of course. Svartava2 (talk) 03:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello and ,Do you have any doubts about the ကတ္တူရဳကာ term I wrote? I do not do anything without evidence, so I do with evidence, so everything I do can show solid evidence, so if you have any doubts about what I have done, please contact me first. I'm currently busy with other Wikipedia languages, so please be patient if I'm late for writing, I sent you the evidence link to the ကတ္တူရဳကာ terminology you are skeptical about, take a look at the area I pointed out with a pen, if you have any questions about Mon literature, please feel free to contact me, thanks.--Music writer Dr.Intobesa of Japanese idol NMB48 and BNK48. (talk) 17:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, the link itself wouldn't count as a cite to recreate the entry. doesn't have any hits on google books, see . Is your link from a published book? If it is, you can cite it as, then this entry could be recreated. Svartava2 (talk) 02:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Do not do a Google search for everything related to Mon vocabulary, there are also some misspellings of Mon vocabulary on Google and Facebook, some dictionary websites also have a lot of misspellings of Mon vocabulary, including English Wiktionary, Thai Wiktionary, Chinese Wiktionary, Japanese Wiktionary, I did my best to find and correct the Mon vocabulary misspellings in English Wiktionary, Thai Wiktionary, Chinese Wiktionary, Japanese Wiktionary, another Mon Japanese Dictionary PDF file contains many Mon vocabulary misspellings. we have two types of Mon writing, these writings are Mon Pali writing and ordinary Mon writing, you can see examples of Old Mon Pali writing and Old ordinary Mon writing from the 6th century AD.

The photo I showed you was from the 1965 Mon-Burmese-English-Pali 4-language dictionary book, you can see more as evidence. The author of this book is also one of my teachers, he has long since died of old age, at that time, there was no literary scholar in Burma better than him, thanks.--Music writer Dr.Intobesa of Japanese idol NMB48 and BNK48. (talk) 04:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Book cover
 * Author of the book
 * that citation looks okay to me, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to recreate the entry. You could yourself create it with: