Talk:კვირიონი

Learned borrowing
, learned borrowings do not exist in dialects unless it is a word taught to peasants by priests during sermons. Did you mean the first sense is a learned borrowing? Vahag (talk) 16:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)


 * For the first one, yes. Though mayhaps we can do without lbor as well. კვარია (talk) 16:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * a methodological point. I see you followed Noble's proposal at . But a ghost word accidentally created by a translator monk in Palestine could not have found its way to the dialects of Guria and Kakheti. The peasants could not have known about its existence in some manuscript. Your finding of the word in dialectal dictionaries means the word is real and not a mangling of Greek. That is how I know Acharyan's etymology of is wrong. Vahag (talk) 09:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, then one'd have to find a satisfactory explanation for . კვარია (talk) 09:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * How is relevant? That one can be the translator's creation. Vahag (talk) 12:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Because it's in the same manuscript, allegedly. I'll look into it... slowly. I don't terrible enjoy philology to be honest. :p კვარია (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Philology is 90% of the work. If you have cornered the period, geography and context, the etymology falls into your hands like an overripe fruit. Vahag (talk) 15:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)