Talk:ᚷᚨᛊᛏᛁᛉ

RFV discussion: September–November 2018
This exists in compounds for sure, but does it exist on its own? If not, it should be treated like and be moved to the Reconstruction namespace. Some sources on Google Books write it as -gastiz, implying it is not attested outside compounds (though no doubt it did exist on its own as well; if it is indeed unattested, it will only be because the corpus of Proto-Norse inscriptions is just too small). — Mnemosientje (t · c) 20:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Moved to Reconstruction:Proto-Norse/ᚷᚨᛊᛏᛁᛉ. It's attested by the standards of historical linguistics, but only in compounds, so it's unattested by the standards of lexicography. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)