Talk:⠉

RFC discussion: July 2014
I noticed this entry, and ⠋, ⠑, ⠓, ⠙, ⠚, and ⠛, in Category:English lemmas. It turns out that although the L2 says ==Translingual==, at least one of the L3 POS headers was using an English headword-line template, resulting in incorrect categorisation (not just into the new lemma categories, but into Category:English abbreviations). I've fixed these entries to use Translingual headword line templates, but we should be on the lookout for more entries like this. (I think there is a WT:TODO list that catches some or all of these, but can't find it at the moment.) - -sche (discuss) 04:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)