Talk:ウンウンエンニウム

RFV discussion: December 2016–September 2017
I should've stopped where Fumiko stopped. No elements above 118 are attested. Nibiko (talk) 05:21, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Additionally, it would appear that the other systematic names hardly have any citations at all. The four new non-systematic names already have citations in Google Books, Groups, News, and Scholar, and are only going to get more, so it's not a general problem with the language. Note that some are more dated than others. Each of these needs to be individually verified, however, I couldn't verify any of these in my searching, so I think that very few, if any, would pass. The list starts from element 104 and goes to element 122. Note how the English entries for some of these are marked as dated and lacking a translations table. To be clear, the non-systematic names (such as ラザホージウム (razahōjiumu, "rutherfordium")) are easily attested, whereas the systematic names (such as ウンニルクアジウム (unnirukuajiumu, "unnnilquadium")) are very rare. Nibiko (talk) 06:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I’m sure the systematic names for elements 104-109 were in . Elements 110-118 should be easily attested too. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 03:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * As I said, I can't attest them, so for whatever reason, people aren't using the elements with Latin numbers in the name. I get 10 hits on Google Books and 40 hits on Google Scholar for "１０４番元素" and 6 hits on Google Books and 1 hit on Google Scholar for "１０４番目の元素". Nibiko (talk) 04:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * All are RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 08:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

RFV discussion: December 2016–September 2017

 * See Talk:ウンウンエンニウム.