Talk:䯂

RfV February 2013
Japanese. Tagged in [//en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E4%AF%82&diff=19278882&oldid=17525845 this edit]. - -sche (discuss) 07:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


 * By one point of view, any Chinese character could conceivably be Japanese as well. However, this particular character is not listed in the List of non-Jōyō characters; it is not listed in Jim Breen's online kanji dictionary (you'll have to copy-paste, I cannot link directly); it is not listed as having a Japanese reading in the Unihan database of characters.  Unless someone can cite this, I'd say this is bogus.
 * FWIW, my cursory search for citations found exactly zip for (adding the  helps filter for Japanese), and presumably 8,000+ hits across the rest of the web, but mostly moji-bake or scannos by my estimation.  The  topmost hit that's actually in real Japanese claims that this character is included in the JIS X 0213 character encoding scheme, but the non-Jōyō list linked above is supposedly that same scheme, and it doesn't include this character.  Neither does the official Japanese government list of non-Jōyō characters, where this kanji would presumably fall between numbers 513 and 514 in the list.
 * Weblio's entry from KANJIDIC only lists a Chinese reading, with an explicit note that "this character isn't used much in Japanese".
 * Delete, unless someone can cite it. &#8209;&#8209; Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 21:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Failed. — Ungoliant (Falai) 19:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Just leaving this here
—suzukaze (t・c) 05:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * - in JIS2004
 * - in the Adobe-Japan-1 character set
 * Groups listed at the bottom of : "GlyphWiki:JISとIVD-2面93区", "グループ:日本提案字"
 * Also, Unihan can be unreliable at times: weird glosses ("癌|marmoset") and on/kun/Korean readings given to characters that are clearly simplified Chinese