Talk:一本

From RFC
Definitions do not make sense and need to be rewritten. &mdash; Paul G 10:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I've attempted to make things easier to understand. Could you explain what it is that doesn't make sense to you? Cynewulf 13:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Surely the section under Etymology 1 is no more than the sum of its parts? There should only be separate entries for 一 and 本. † Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 13:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, it's one word, and the reading is hard to guess.. but anyway it appears that any "set phrase" in non-English languages is to be included, i.e. anything that gets a large number of hits on Google when searching as a phrase. See WT:RFD Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, WT:RFD person who beats. Cynewulf 13:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * OK; well you’d know more about this than I would. I defer unto your superior knowledge. † Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 15:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, "the highest points in the judge points." does not make sense. It looks like a sentence but is not. I don't understand what it is intended to mean. &mdash; Paul G 18:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've tried to clarify it. See also the wikipedia article. Kappa 04:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)