Talk:丁丁貓儿

RFD discussion: December 2016–March 2017
Traditional and simplified mixed together. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 16:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Question: was using 儿 for erhua specifically to differentiate from 兒 "child" ever standard? —suzukaze (t・c) 08:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Probably not, but I can't be sure. The book has some other simplified characters in it, so it might just have been for ease of writing., any thoughts? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 01:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I agree with Justin. Wyang (talk) 01:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I think it is safe to assume that 儿 is not used in (standard) traditional Chinese. Moedict only lists information from the Shuowen, and that it is one of the 24 radicals, nothing about erhuayin. ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Deleted. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)