Talk:乾物


 * 1) Actually, the alt parameter of  is not necessary on non-lemma entries, because it is a property of words instead of spellings and duplicating them for every spelling adds burden to maintenance (compare the former approach to interwiki links), and because  is able to copy that information from the lemma entry and display it in a dictionary-like format: ほしもの【干物・干し物・乾物・乾し物】.
 * 2) * By the way, I wonder if ほしもの【干（し）物・乾（し）物】 is better (or worse?).
 * 3) The layout problem could be solved by slightly increasing the margin-bottom of  if it persists. --Dine2016 (talk) 03:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * @Dine2016, thanks for having a look. For the layout, it's a bit longer, but I think ほしもの【干物・干し物・乾物・乾し物】 is clearer and less likely to confuse users.  ほしもの【干（し）物・乾（し）物】 is visually harder to parse, and could be confusing for anyone who doesn't understand the notation (and even I still struggle with it some after all these years).
 * Thanks too for the idea about the layout. I totally understand and agree with your thoughts on content reusability and on the importance of splitting data from presentation, hence my edit comment about "layout hack".  :)  My thought is that this entry is currently intended as a model of how we might want the final render to look, and that we would clean out the manual  s from the wikicode once the templates don't overlap awkwardly like this.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)