Talk:伙伴

火伴 is still used in traditional Chinese, as seen in this and this. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 20:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The corresponding simplified form should be 火伴. The |t2=, |t3= functions in are used to show multiple-to-one trad-simp or simp-trad correspondences. Wyang (talk) 23:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know if 火伴 is used in simplified Chinese, as it has been standardized to be 伙伴. The second link supports this by putting 伙伴 as the simplified form of 火伴. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 23:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Simplified Chinese is still 火伴. e.g. 《》:

"火伴 北魏時，軍中以十人為火，共灶炊食，故稱同火者為火伴. 後泛指同伴. 　《樂府詩集‧橫吹曲辭五‧木蘭詩之一》：“出門看火伴，火伴皆驚忙. ” 　唐元稹《估客樂》詩：“出門求火伴，入門辭父兄. ” 　《水滸傳》第四四回：“西山地面廣闊，可令童威、童猛弟兄帶領十數個火伴那裏開店. ” 火見 (火見,火见) 心星出現. 　《左傳‧莊公二十九年》：“凡土功，龍見而畢務，戒事也. 火見而致用，水昏正而栽，日至而畢. ” 　宋陸游《村舍雜書》詩之五：“作麴及良時，火見金始伏. ”"


 * 《高級漢語詞典》:

"火伴 huǒbàn [comrades-in-arms] 等于说“战友”. 古代兵制以十人为火,共灶起火,故称同火者为火伴 出门看火伴. ——《乐府诗集·木兰诗》 火伴皆惊忙."


 * Wyang (talk) 23:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, I see. Are you saying that 伙伴 and 火伴 are different in simplified? If not, can't we put 火伴 in s2? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * They are different, and I think each of these simp-trad correspondences should have its own, with being used in the definition. Wyang (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2016 (UTC)