Talk:保護消費者運動

RFD discussion: April 2020–February 2021
Sum of parts. "Consumer" + "protection" + "campaign". Not in any dictionaries. Not even in the Chinese encyclopedia Baidu Baike. ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 00:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I think you missed 教育部國語詞典重編本. That being said, it does seem SoP. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Minor devil's advocacy: it's "protection" + "consumer" + "campaign", so not just a one-to-one correspondence. Not sure if the difference in term construction is notable enough though.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 21:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * A literal translation of the Chinese is "protect" + "consumer" + "campaign", but this construction would give "campaign for protecting consumers" or more idiomatically, "consumer protection campaign". — justin(r)leung { (t...) 21:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Meh. :)  Noun or verb comes down to syntactic context, and I used the noun to mirror the first line in this thread.  Mostly I just wanted to clarify that the term in question doesn't quite parse out as "consumer" + "protection" + "campaign" as initially described.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * True. Anyway, I don't think the difference in order makes much difference in determining its SoPness. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 19:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. SoP. RcAlex36 (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

RFD-deleted. , I ask for your help in vetting the items listed at Special:WhatLinksHere/保護消費者運動. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 00:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)