Talk:化學的

RFD discussion: March–April 2016
SOP: 化學 + 的. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 03:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. —suzukaze (t・c) 06:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete with speed. Obvious SoP. ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 11:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

化学的
Simplified form of 化學的. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 03:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You don't actually need to list this separately, but it doesn't do any harm either I suppose. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:00, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * (I've seen simplified forms go undeleted before. —suzukaze (t・c) 18:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC))
 * I think this is a deletion request of the Chinese entry. The Japanese entry has no problem, because the Japanese 的 is a suffix, not a particle. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 23:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, correct, only Chinese. The same would apply for Korean 化學的 (if existed), a hanja form of or Japanese (if existed) kyūjitai form of . --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 00:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * delete. SOP Johnny Shiz (talk) 15:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)