Talk:協神星

RFV discussion: April–June 2022
—Fish bowl (talk) 00:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Attested in officially approved national standard glossary of astronomy terms. --H2NCH2COOH (Talk) 04:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually this website cites two sources, and one of them is publicly accessiblen. There is also another source from Taiwan (in 2018天文常數 PDF file). --H2NCH2COOH (Talk) 06:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Please read WT:ATTEST. I would think these are more like mentions rather than uses. Being in an approved glossary doesn't mean it can be an entry here. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 07:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Inclusion in an officially approved national standard surely goes above and beyond a mere mention, no? It's generally considered enough for inclusion in Unicode (where that applies). Theknightwho (talk) 11:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late reply. We are not Unicode. Simply appearing in the list doesn't count as a use (see WT:ATTEST, "Conveying meaning"). — justin(r)leung { (t...) 22:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 23:00, 5 June 2022 (UTC)