Talk:印度錦蛇

RFV discussion: December 2018–May 2019
cf. Talk:蒙古山猫. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 07:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Applying the same approach as described at Talk:蒙古山猫, we find that generates exactly one hit, only in "snippet view" where we can't verify that this isn't just a scanno.  On the wider web,  nets us only 36 ostensible hits, collapsing to 19 when paging through.  Of these 19, four appear to be Wiktionary itself or pickups or scrapes of our content, a couple more are dubious spammy sites, and a few more are mentions rather than uses.  I haven't run into any fully cromulent CFI-fulfilling uses, although I haven't gone through all 19 of those hits.
 * Looks like this one probably won't pass muster. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 18:06, 20 December 2018 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:31, 7 May 2019 (UTC)