Talk:厼

RFV discussion: February 2019–February 2021
I couldn't find the reading of on the dictionaries. Found two webcites mentioned, it seems not to be a part of Modern Korean but Idu (吏讀) of the ancient times. I don't know how to describe this reading. --荒巻モロゾフ (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * @荒巻モロゾフ: There are many kind of theory, and it can largely divided into "금" (geum) and "곰" (gom) depending on reading ways of Idu. #1, #2 p.s. I don't suggest to see Namuwiki, because it is probably inaccurate. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * RFV-deleted &mdash; surjection &lang;??&rang; 17:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

RFV discussion: September 2019–February 2021
Rfv-sense

厼 (eumhun 금) It is the borrowed notation(借字表記 / 차자표기), which was veryfied in some references. (1984, P. Nam, “차자표기법 연구”(借字表記法 硏究), Dankook University Publish, published 1984.)Reference

是去有良厼. 이거이신아금. attested in the Jeonyul Tongbo (典律通補 / 전율통보), 1786. Reference

--Meoru00 (talk) 14:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Are you familiar with this? RcAlex36 (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * This was used since the first millennium to write the distributive/emphatic particle, obsolete in modern Korean except in a few fossilized words like . Not sure about the glyph origin, though. Korean probably isn't the best L2 header for it.--Tibidibi (talk) 01:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)