Talk:可訴訟罪

RFV discussion: January–April 2022
Rfv-sense: indictable offence It is therefore doubted whether there are sufficient usages attesting these nominated entries.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Search in both ordinary Google search and Google book don't find any legal documents using the terms, apart from some other online dictionaries suspected of plagiarizing from English Wiktionary.
 * Moreover, the Chinese term meaning "indictable offence" in Hong Kong law should be (eg. Section 2 of the Magistrates Ordinance (Cap. 227), or the offence of "處理已知道或相信為代表從可公訴罪行的得益的財產" (aka money laundering) in the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance (Cap. 455)), while the concept itself is alien to the criminal procedure laws of civil law jurisdictions, as all criminal charges are initiated by indictments of the prosecutors (or the Criminal Indictment Court (zh: 刑事起訴法庭/pt: Juízo de Instrução Criminal) for the case of Macau)
 * Notifying creator.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for looking into this. 可訴訟罪 and 可檢控罪 are commonly used in English-Mandarin interpreting. However, I note zero hits for the former and only three hits for the latter on Google Books. 可公訴罪行 is indeed the more standard rendering. ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 23:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)