Talk:吾

RFD discussion: November 2020–November 2021
No phonogramic component, hence the reconstruction is unverifiable and the entry is not useful for readers. If this is accepted, we might as well have all Chinese characters in the Buddhist canon as "Old Korean" entries. These sort of entries only serve to dilute the usefulness of Category:Old Korean lemmas.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 00:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. AG202 (talk) 22:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

汝
Same with above.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 00:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. AG202 (talk) 22:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

RFD-deleted for both. AG202 (talk) 02:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)