Talk:多Q事

Is this a Cantonese or a Mandarin term or both? Also,. It needs a conversion to proper Chinese templates. Would they pass CFI? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 08:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It's Cantonese. I don't think it would be considered a word. Wyang (talk) 08:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Canto, and I personally believe it should not even be counted as a word but rather as dosi + -cat-, similar to constructions like mat-gwai-si and bin-gwai-gojan. —suzukaze (t・c) 08:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * : In any case it is just a sum of parts: + Q (euphemism of swear word). The Q could be injected in any two-character words. --kc_kennylau (talk) 08:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Same goes with 7. --kc_kennylau (talk) 08:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've deleted all these badly formatted entries. A few more categories with "Mandarin ... in traditional script"/"Mandarin ... in simplified script" are gone. A few leftovers like Category:Mandarin interjections in traditional script, etc and entries still using "cmn" templates and "Mandarin" L2 headers. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)