Talk:大馬哈

RFD discussion: August 2020
Looks totally wrong to me. Created by. --TheDarkKnightLi &#8203;(STAY HAPPY) 15:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

冠狀肺炎
Created by the same IP. --TheDarkKnightLi &#8203;(STAY HAPPY) 16:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

新型冠狀肺炎
Created by the same IP. --TheDarkKnightLi &#8203;(STAY HAPPY) 16:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

新冠狀肺炎
Created by the same IP. --TheDarkKnightLi &#8203;(STAY HAPPY) 16:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

新冠狀病毒
Created by the same IP. --TheDarkKnightLi &#8203;(STAY HAPPY) 16:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

脊灰炎
Created by the same IP. --TheDarkKnightLi &#8203;(STAY HAPPY) 17:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

新冠狀病毒病
Created by the same IP. --TheDarkKnightLi &#8203;(STAY HAPPY) 17:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

冠病
Created by the same IP. --TheDarkKnightLi &#8203;(STAY HAPPY) 17:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * I don't think these should be brought here. I don't see anything in these entries that would be relevant here (except maybe 戰疫). It's probably better to RFV them. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 08:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

RFV discussion: August 2020–August 2021
大馬哈 is cited for all the senses in the entry. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 17:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * RFV passed for 大馬哈. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

冠狀肺炎
Cited except for the "spanning at least a year" condition. The first citation for now is from the end of February, so we could wait it out and see if we can find anything in February/March. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 22:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Cited. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 13:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * RFV passed for 冠狀肺炎. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 17:03, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

新冠狀肺炎
Cited except for the "spanning at least a year" condition. The first citation (for now) is from April 27. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Cited. The first citation is now from March 30, 2020, and the latest citation is from April 15, 2021. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 23:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * RFV passed for 新冠狀肺炎. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

新冠狀病毒
There are some hits that refer to SARS-CoV-1. In this case, would it be better to send to RFD because it may just be SoP? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Moved to WT:RFDN. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:24, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

脊灰炎
Cited. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 01:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * RFV passed for 脊灰炎. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

新冠狀病毒病
Should be cited. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 05:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * RFV passed for 新冠狀病毒病. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

冠病
See for Hokkien,  for Teochew,   for Cantonese and  for Mandarin. These are all videos published by the Singaporean government, so it does show that these terms are used. I'm not sure if they count as evidence though. The dog2 (talk) 07:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)


 * They're not evidence for rfv since we're not sure if they're durably archived, but they can be used as evidence for pronunciation. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 17:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Cited except for the "spanning at least a year" condition. The first citation is from February 17, 2020. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 04:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Cited. --沈澄心✉ 04:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


 * RFV passed for 冠病. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

新型冠狀肺炎
Cited. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 15:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)


 * RFV passed for 新型冠狀肺炎. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

All created by. --TheDarkKnightLi &#8203;(STAY HAPPY) 14:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thedarkknightli: I have undone massive text edits by in defence of  (you can see the edit history). If anything is worth keeping as a citation, it can be added to the entry itself. It was an inappropriate for the IP to post so much text in this discussion. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 13:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Atitarev: It was good evidence, so it's not entirely inappropriate to post all of that. Not everything is durably archived, but it does show a good amount of usage out there. Anyway, here's the for ease of access and archiving purposes. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Justinrleung: Thanks, maybe the citations could be restored in a collapsed mode, if you know how? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 07:12, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If the quotations look good, I suggest copying them as-is to the appropriate citations pages where they will be found more easily. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thedarkknightli: I don't know why you're doubting the IP, who seems to know what they're doing. The reason of RFV is kind of weak, but of course, if you still have doubts, you could continue with the requests. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It would be good to add another quotation for because the one that is there only evidences the transformation of the suffix from 魚 to 幼魚.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Cited based on Justinrleung's statement above that the evidence is good. I take no position on the quality of the evidence. I copied all the quotations from the old revision of this page to the appropriate citations pages and linked them using zh.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 19:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It's only cited if we check to make sure the sources are durably archived. Many of them come from news sites, but that doesn't mean they were actually published in newspapers. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 20:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)


 * RFV passed except for 新冠狀病毒, which has been sent (back) to WT:RFDN. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 21:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)