Talk:奴隸制度

奴隶制度
If it doesn't pass the lemming test, I think this is an SoP in Chinese: +. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:52, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * FWIW, MDBG has it for ZH, and Daijirin has the corresponding spelling for JA.  (Shogakukan also has it, but that's dead-tree and not linkable.)  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * PS: would be the  or pre-reform spelling for JA as well.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * : Thanks for the response and the links. So, lemming test is passed but is there another argument for keeping the entry/entries? An English word for "slavery" exists, what's the Chinese for for it? The word is likely to be looked up? We need to have separate CFI for languages such as Chinese and Japanese where word boundaries are not clear. Please note that the Korean and the Vietnamese cognates and  are not necessarily considered single words (the word order in Vietnamese is reversed). --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm ambivalent about this, but if we do delete, could someone please add the term as an example collocation. ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 14:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Kept. No consensus.--Jusjih (talk) 04:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)