Talk:威卡教人

RFD discussion: October 2020
Basically zero ghits. Speedy delete this? RcAlex36 (talk) 08:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I added  to render it as the sum of  + .  The first part, which the same editor recently added, has a few hits.  But as so defined it looks like a sum of parts "Wicca person".  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 12:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 威卡教人 is clearly wrong. What do you call Catholics and Buddhists in Chinese? and, not *天主教人 and *佛教人. It is clear that the creator of the page is unfamiliar with the language and has no idea what they are doing. RcAlex36 (talk) 12:47, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Should the page be moved to 威卡教徒? Vox Sciurorum (talk) 13:19, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * RFV is probably the better avenue for this since the argument for deletion is that it is not attested and wrong. 威卡教徒 seems to have some ghits, so if we have enough citations, I would support moving to it. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 23:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Seems like has moved it to 威卡教徒. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 23:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


 * RFD resolved. The redirect page 威卡教人 has been deleted. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 15:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)