Talk:婦

The Zhengzhang Shangfang Old Chinese data says that the right component is a phonetic component. —suzukaze (t・c) 08:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Very interesting. Added to the entry. Thanks! Wyang (talk) 08:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * What's more interesting is that you wrote this before I added it, unless I'm confused about what you're referring to. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 08:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I forgot to save it... :/ Wyang (talk) 09:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * This may give more insight:
 * "從「女」從「帚」，「帚」亦是聲符. 「帚」是「婦」的初文，「帚」本指掃帚，傳統認為打掃是婦女的職責，故用「帚」來表示婦女. 後因「帚」專指掃帚，故加「女」旁以表示婦女之義."
 * What do you think? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 09:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


 * 《[說文解字》：服也. 从女持帚灑掃也. Oracle bone: 婦 and 帚. The modern Old Chinese linguists probably would dismiss Xu Shen's claim in Shuowen, saying he was misinformed as the *pj- to t͡ɕ sound change had already finished during his time. [[User:Wyang|Wyang]] (talk) 09:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)