Talk:寇巴俄狐

RFV discussion: June 2020–May 2022
Created by, who certainly got it from Wikipedia (considering past discussions :p).

Google Books has two mentions (Jing ji bu gong bao, Volume 35, Issues 22-24; 臺北市政府公報, Part 1 / Taiwan sheng zheng fu gong bao, Part 1).

Google Scholar has 0 results. —Suzukaze-c (talk) 07:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Usually used in lists from the Taiwanese government. I'm not sure if these count as mentions or uses. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 20:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * I managed to fine two uses for this so far. If we count one of the instances in the lists from the Taiwanese government documents as a use, this should be cited. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * RFV failed for 寇巴俄狐. Lists probably do not count towards attestation. The two quotes are kept at Citations:寇巴俄狐. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

厄瓜多爾胡狼, 厄瓜多尔胡狼
One Google Books mention (破坏环境资源保护罪的定罪与量刑).

0 Google Scholar results. —Suzukaze-c (talk) 07:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Appears in legislation by the Hong Kong government regarding endangered animals, a mention. —Suzukaze-c (talk) 07:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Chinese government uses 厄瓜多尔狐狼 in its CITES appendix. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 12:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)


 * RFV failed for 厄瓜多爾胡狼. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 08:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

山狐
Nothing in G.Books / G.Scholar for  (scientific name to narrow down the results from "mountain" + "fox") —Suzukaze-c (talk) 07:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)


 * @Suzukaze-c I created those entries quite early in my time here, when I wasn't aware that I couldn't take terms from Wikipedia... Funnily enough, I had thought of sending these terms to RFV earlier, but then I saw that they had hits on QQ. --Corsicanwarrah (talk) 08:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Only one cite found. RFV failed. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)