Talk:封邱

Which is it? 1 Former name, 2 alternate form and/or 3 simplified version
封丘 seems like a simplified form of 封邱. In 1955, 邱 was considered an alternate form of 丘.

In 1988, 邱 was brought back for use in surnames.

In the 2013 Table of General Standard Chinese Characters, 邱 is not connected to 丘 (no "only surnames" restriction).

An old book and an old map say 封丘 was once written as 封邱. Local businesses in the area still use 封邱.

The area government uses the form 封丘 today.

So 封邱 is a former (or current?) traditional form, an alternate form and also the former name of the town?

--Geographyinitiative (talk) 02:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * A nearly identical situation has arisen with . I don't know if I have handled either situation correctly.--Geographyinitiative (talk) 05:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Same with . --Geographyinitiative (talk) 09:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Maybe handle this like 鉅鹿 & 巨鹿 are handled? . --Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:55, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * , --Geographyinitiative (talk) 21:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * , --Geographyinitiative (talk) 01:51, 9 June 2019 (UTC)