Talk:小女

RFV discussion: April 2019–February 2021
Rfv-sense: "little girl" — justin(r)leung { (t...) 05:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Wouldn’t “little woman/girl” be a literal sense (and thus SOP)? --Lambiam 06:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Possibly. If it is a verifiable sense, I'd say we should still keep it since 女 is kind of a bound morpheme in Mandarin. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 14:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * @Justinrleung I disagree that 女 being a "bound morpheme" affects the outcome of this verification discussion in any way. Here we have articles for phrases such as 小刀, 大桥/大橋, and 小孩子, and the latter parts of each of them make sense in independent contexts. This whole discussion does not make sense. If anything, we should be nominating the types of phrases I've listed instead of phrases like 小女. ωικιωαrrιor ᑫᑫ1ᑫ 13:10, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The "bound morpheme" thing is addressing Lambiam's concern of whether the entry should exist (which would be dealt with at WT:RFDN). That is not an issue, which means the verification process should continue for the definition "little girl". — justin(r)leung { (t...) 17:14, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * This sense is not found in these dictionaries: 漢語大詞典, 重編國語辭典修訂本, 國語辭典簡編本, 牛津英汉汉英词典 (Oxford Chinese Dictionary), 现代汉语规范词典 (The Standard Dictionary of Contemporary Chinese), 现代汉语词典. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 07:39, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * RFV deleted. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 09:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)