Talk:小聡明い

RFV discussion: June 2021–March 2022
Kanji spelling of あざとい. Search results are for mentiones in pop articles. —Suzukaze-c (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Not finding this kanji spelling in any of my sources. Example entry from the KDJ at https://kotobank.jp/word/%E3%81%82%E3%81%96%E3%81%A8%E3%81%84-195790.  The KDJ is pretty good about including even rare and historical-only information, and their entry doesn't mention this spelling.  See also a lack of any entries at either https://kotobank.jp/word/%E5%B0%8F%E8%81%A1%E6%98%8E without the okurigana (the index form for certain references in Kotobank) or https://kotobank.jp/word/%E5%B0%8F%E8%81%A1%E6%98%8E%E3%81%84 with the okurigana (the index form for other references).  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 00:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Pinging as entry creator -- can you update the entry with any sources or cites? If not, we'll have to delete the entry as unverifiable. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * I added this after seeing it on Weblio at https://www.weblio.jp/content/%E5%B0%8F%E8%81%A1%E6%98%8E%E3%81%84. I did a web search and found a lot of sites about it and a YouTube video using it. LittleWhole (talk) 05:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Looking deeper into this, the problem is not finding the word azatoi spelled as, but rather finding it in use. I can find tons of web pages talking about the word, but not that actually use the word.
 * Googling with lots of exclusionary operators to try to whittle down the list of hits still nets me lots of pages talking about the word rather than using it:
 * 2,300 ostensible hits, collapsing to 98 when paging through. Of those, all of them that I've looked at so far (20+) are talking about the word, rather than using it.
 * 21 ostensible hits, but none of the extracted blurbs actually contain the word -- and of the 2 works that offer preview, neither contains the word at all.
 * Per WT:CFI, we need at least 3 cites of the word used, not mentioned, in running text in a way that conveys meaning. Mentions that only talk about the word are not sufficient.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 21 ostensible hits, but none of the extracted blurbs actually contain the word -- and of the 2 works that offer preview, neither contains the word at all.
 * Per WT:CFI, we need at least 3 cites of the word used, not mentioned, in running text in a way that conveys meaning. Mentions that only talk about the word are not sufficient.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Nothing in the OCR'd part of the National Diet Library. —Fish bowl (talk) 23:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Fish bowl (talk) 23:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)