Talk:局子

Label
Why did you lebelled sense "snare; trap" as "literary"? Dokurrat (talk) 09:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The Cross-Straits dictionary lists all this term's senses, including 圈套, 單位, 商店 and 句子裡的夥伴, as <書>. I only got around to editing in the first two senses. ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 13:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * ....... Dokurrat (talk) 13:07, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, I just looked it up in Cross-Straits dictionary, the citation they used for that sense is 兒女英雄傳. But 兒女英雄傳 was written in vernacular Chinese; specifically, this novel reflected Beijing dialectal usage of the time which the author was in (which is in Qing Dynasty). I failed to see how is that a literary sense - just because a term of a specific sense is used in a written media does not mean that sense is literary.
 * This sense is included in 新编北京方言词典 (2010). Dokurrat (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2018 (UTC) (modified)
 * I have read the other senses of this word they labelled as "literary"; the citations they used all reflected vernacular usages. I found their labelling for this word unconvincing. Dokurrat (talk) 14:02, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Feel free to make any changes you see fit. ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 06:18, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay. Dokurrat (talk) 06:27, 17 October 2018 (UTC)