Talk:师

Definition missing
Why is the second definition, given at the entry for the traditional character (師), not given here? 24.93.170.200 22:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Surname
I believe this character can represent a (rare) Chinese surname. This should be added to the definitions. 24.93.170.200 07:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


 * True for China, but not for Japan or Korea. Therefore, I stuck it under Mandarin as an archaic meaning.  -- A-cai 12:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

There are still living people with this surname, so, even if only a few people have it, I don't believe it's archaic. 24.93.170.200 22:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I stand corrected. This website verifies your claim. -- A-cai 01:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)