Talk:彷佛

therzVARIANTStho('dubl/singlsideman
81.11.219.175 13:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

rfd
typothen?>http://mp3.sogou.com/music.so?query=%B6%C0%D5%BC%C9%F1%BB%B0&st=5<ard4learnrden..(entryFR.MISpellin'db'andy..81.11.219.175 16:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

RFD discussion: August 2016
Only 彷彿 or 仿佛, not 彷佛. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 16:26, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * We seem to be getting Chinese entries for deletion every day. Is there a particular user or group of users who are making these SoP entries? Shouldn't we warn them on their talk page or something to stop doing this? I don't know the situation, I'm just asking. Philmonte101 (talk) 16:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * This particular one is not SOP. The two above aren't SOP either. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 16:34, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Then did you mean to take this to RFV, rather than RFD? —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 16:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, maybe that's more appropriate. Here. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 16:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * There are hits on the Chinese Text Project, have you seen them? ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 04:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

RFV discussion: August 2016–November 2017
AFAIK, it should only be 彷彿 or 仿佛, not 彷佛. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 16:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, zhwiktionary has it, but it was added by a bot in 2010. If this is incorrect, I'm tempted to let them know as well. Philmonte101 (talk) 16:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * This term seems kinda Buddhist to me... ;)  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 16:56, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The Chinese Wiktionary cannot be trusted since there aren't enough people there looking after the pages. There are way too many pages generated by bots. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * (Category:Chinese misspellings is always another option. —suzukaze (t・c) 20:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC))


 * Pleco dictionary lists it as a variant. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I guess we could resort to that. Which dictionary in Pleco is it from? Is it computer-generated? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry, my mistake. It's not Pleco's dictionary but CC, which is included in Pleco.
 * The entry looks like this:
 * 彷⧸仿彿⧸佛〔仿佛〕
 * PY fǎngfú
 * ZY ㄈㄤˇㄈㄨˊ
 * JP fing2 fat1 JP fong2 fat1 --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 04:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure how we should interpret "彷⧸仿彿⧸佛". I'm not sure this is strong enough evidence for 彷佛. Also, MDBG clearly has 彷彿 and 仿佛, but not 彷佛. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 11:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * "彷⧸仿彿⧸佛" means each character can be replaced in the traditional form. Wenlin only gives 仿佛//彷彿 fǎngfú. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if that's what CC meant to say, since MDBG, which, if I'm not mistaken, is based on CC, only has 彷彿 and 仿佛.


 * (Continuing the discussion from RFD) I think there are all errors in digitizing the original text. Looking at the book scans of the four texts given here (封神演義, 太平御覽1, 太平御覽2, 太平廣記, 儒林外史), I think this would only legitimize keeping it as a misspelling. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 12:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wyang (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as no attestation found and per above discussion. Dokurrat (talk) 01:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * , there are lots of hits for, some of which are not real hits if you look at the preview. The rest needs to be checked. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 12:53, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

RFV failed. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 00:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)