Talk:急須

RFV discussion: October 2017–May 2019
Is it really a variant of 急需? Dokurrat (talk) 12:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * And the second etymology as well looks... interesting. Can we attest this meaning? ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 02:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * -- Re: etym 2 for the Chinese term, I find that JA sources agree with the following from Daijirin as the source of the JA term of the same spelling:

〔もと中国で酒の燗(ｶﾝ)に用いた器が日本に伝わって煎茶器になったという〕 (Apparently, originally a container used in China to warm alcoholic beverages, brought to Japan and used as a container for tea)
 * Perhaps etym 2 for the Chinese is for a term that is now obsolete? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 01:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Okay, for the first etymology, there are usages of this word in the internet. And I believe that to analyse this word orthographically as 急("urgently") + 須("(v.) must; have to") is problematic if this word is followed by a noun, which does happen; It should be analysed phonetically as an alternative form of. So I withdraw the rfv nomination for the first etymology of 急須. Dokurrat (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Etymology 2 should be cited. If any of you want to attempt translating the quotes, that'd be great. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 19:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * RFV passed. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 03:46, 16 May 2019 (UTC)