Talk:折衝

There is a usage for this word here that I am not familiar with but that is definitely different from the archaic meaning and can be used in international relations --Geographyinitiative (talk) 04:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

RFV discussion: February 2021–August 2022
Rfv-sense: "war chariot". This seems to stem from a misunderstanding of Guoyu Cidian, which defines it as "打退敵人攻城的戰車". — justin(r)leung { (t...) 16:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Also Rfv-sense: "to repulse an enemy". Tagged by when adding the sense to the entry. Pleco is mentioned in their edit summary. I'm not sure what the reason for RFV is. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 16:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I see both meanings here: 打退敵人攻城的戰車. 指拒敵取勝.  --Geographyinitiative (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * If you're saying "war chariot" = 打退敵人攻城的戰車, then it seems to be a misunderstanding. It should be read as 打退 [敵人攻城的戰車]. It doesn't make sense that a noun sense is placed with a verb sense in one definition. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't know enough to provide any further assistance here. Please edit the entry according to the evidence and Wiktionary policy. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * In Hanyu Da Cidian this sense is defined as 使敵人的戰車后撤. 即制敵取勝. 沈澄心✉ 03:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)


 * RFV failed for the noun sense. Quotes are needed for the verb sense. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 03:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)


 * It should be cited for the verb sense now. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 23:14, 31 July 2022 (UTC)


 * RFV passed for the verb sense. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 16:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)