Talk:挎

RFV discussion: February 2021–June 2022
Etymology 2 under Chinese. Tagged by but not listed, although I'm not sure what they wanted to RFV when there were no definitions present under etymology 2 at the time when the section was tagged with RFV. RcAlex36 (talk) 16:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I believe this was from the 四川方言词典.--Prisencolin (talk) 00:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


 * RFV resolved with definitions added based on 漢語大字典 and 王力古漢語字典. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 16:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)