Talk:挐絞絞

Dialectal Variations
Hey, just wanna ask for your opinion here. So in MOEDICT, we have this word 挐絞絞 (jû-ká-ká/lû-ká-ká) to mean very messy. In 閩南方言大詞典, we have this word 茹酵酵 (lû-kàⁿ-kàⁿ Xiamen, and assumably lîr-kàⁿ-kàⁿ Quanzhou and jî-kàⁿ-kàⁿ in Zhangzhou), and also 茹漖漖lîr-kà-kà in Quanzhou, and in Philippine Hokkien, we have the word lî-kà-kà meaning the same thing. Do you think all of this should be in the same entry, given the different tones and presence of nasal sounds? Thanks. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 02:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Adding you in this discussion, since you made the entry. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 02:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * We can have it here, I think. 台日大辭典 has it as 茹絞絞 (jû-kà-kà/jî-kà-kà/jîr-kà-kà). — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Where did you get jû-ká-ká/lû-ká-ká? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 03:29, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you search 挐 in MOEDICT, it shows jû-ká-ká, the other one is inferred. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 09:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. I think it's okay to infer lû-ká-ká since lû is in the entry. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 19:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Another question: where is 茹漖漖 in 閩南方言大詞典? I can only see 茹酵酵. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 19:27, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, 茹漖漖 is just a few lines below 茹酵酵. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 21:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Is your edition different from the one I have? lɯ²⁻⁴ka⁵⁻³ka⁵ is written as 茹酵酵 in the edition I have (on page 31). — justin(r)leung { (t...) 22:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess it is. Mine's 修订版. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 22:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * What's the year of publication? Mine is published in 2006. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 22:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Looking at the back page, 印次：2007 年 12 月 第2次印刷 --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 23:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)