Talk:摸摸具和

RFV discussion: April–November 2017
RFV of this specific kanji spelling. No Google Books, Aozora Bunko, or National Diet Library website Google hits, and doesn't appear in other online dictionaries. —suzukaze (t・c) 07:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Surprisingly enough, I have easily found three attestations : [//books.google.com/books?id=lsAYAQAAIAAJ&q=%22%E6%91%B8%E3%80%85%E5%85%B7%E5%92%8C%22&dq=%22%E6%91%B8%E3%80%85%E5%85%B7%E5%92%8C%22&sa=X], [//books.google.com/books?id=Ea5HAQAAIAAJ&q=%22%E6%91%B8%E3%80%85%E5%85%B7%E5%92%8C%22&dq=%22%E6%91%B8%E3%80%85%E5%85%B7%E5%92%8C%22&sa=X], [//books.google.co.kr/books?id=OX9HAAAAYAAJ&q=%22%E6%91%B8%E3%80%85%E5%85%B7%E5%92%8C%22&dq=%22%E6%91%B8%E3%80%85%E5%85%B7%E5%92%8C%22&sa=X]. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 10:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * So a search for the expanded spelling brings up tons of unreliable sources and a search for the abbreviated spelling brings up a decent handful of printed sources... Should the entry be moved to 摸々具和? —suzukaze (t・c)
 * Personally, I think it makes the most sense to leave it the way it is mainly because to have 々 in the kanji table with a reading under it wouldn't make much sense, since it just means to use the same reading as that of the first kanji. 馬太阿房 (talk) 18:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The kanji table shouldn't be a concern; see for example. —suzukaze (t・c) 04:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * All the three sources say it is read モモングヮ, old pronunciation of モモンガ. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:41, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

RFV passed. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 01:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)