Talk:方剂学

RFC discussion: June 2014–January 2017
466 hyponyms, by my best count (in a collapsible box, true, but that's still a lot). Wouldn't this be better as a category? Chuck Entz (talk) 23:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Not only that, but the terms in the list have encyclopedic information such as lists of ingredients with quantities in grams. No evidence that this has ever been looked at by anyone but the creator and some bots. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Doesn't seem to be a problem now. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 20:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC)